my mind on books

The Mind Science Foundation has put together a nice list of over 40 books in their “Consciousness Cyber Library”; plus they are compiling a “Consciousness Researchers Database.” If you’re in the San Antonio, Texas, area you can also take advantage of their speakers and events.

of

Brain Rules: 12 Principles for Surviving and Thriving at Work, Home, and School by John Medina is a new book with a nice website/blog.
He has boiled it all down to 12 rules dealing with exercise, survival, wiring, attention, short-term memory, long-term memory, sleep, stress, sensory integration, vision, gender and exploration.

3/31/08: Seattle Times article

Today’s San Francisco Chronicle (3/16/08) has an interview with Tom Wolfe, discussing “surprisingly trendy neuroscience.” According to the article Wolfe is working on a book on the topic, to be called The Human Beast.

Wolfe’s 1996 essay “Sorry, But Your Soul Just Died,” referred to in the article, is reprinted here.

Wolfe’s 2006 Jefferson Lecture is “The Human Beast.”

Jose Delgado’s “Physical Control of the Mind,” recommended by Wolfe, is available online here

David Chalmers has posted about Andy Clark‘s upcoming book Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. I enjoyed Clark’s earlier book Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence so I’ll be looking forward to this new one.

This seems like an appropriately numerical title in celebration of Pi Day (3.14)…

42: Deep Thought on Life by Mark Vernon sounds like some Monty Python joke, but here is the book description:

Mark Vernon takes his inspiration from 42 of the funniest, wisest, and quirkiest quotations about the big questions in life, and uses these as starting points for his brilliant observations. In each chapter he explains what the greatest thinkers of all time have had to say on subjects such as eternal life, work, love and sex, and the nature of happiness; he draws his own conclusions, and will provoke you to think deeply yourself!

BBC article by Vernon on ’42′ in Douglas Adams’ Hitchhiker’s Guide – (This may be an excerpt from Vernon’s book?); also the publisher’s site has a sample chapter.

I like this Author’s blog!

Mind Hacks has a recent post on the book Disembodied Spirits and Deanimated Bodies: The Psychopathology of Common Sense by Giovanni Stanghellini (Oxford University Press, 2004), which takes a phenomenological approach to schizophrenia and manic-depressive or bipolar disorder.

Google Books page for Disembodied Spirits

The Mind Hacks post also mentions the book Describing Inner Experience?: Proponent Meets Skeptic, which I had just posted about yesterday (from an interested layperson’s perspective).

This article “Consciousness as Content” by Gary Johnson uses the term ‘neuronarrative’ for neurologically or cogsci-oriented fiction, which here I’d earlier termed “neurofiction.” The novels discussed in the above article are Thinks . . . by David Lodge and Richard Powers’s Galatea 2.2: A Novel.

Russell Hurlburt has created a method called “Descriptive Experience Sampling” (DES) that he believes overcomes some of the problems associated with introspection. Eric Schwitzgebel is skeptical about the degree to which inner experience can be accurately described. Describing Inner Experience?: Proponent Meets Skeptic (MIT Press, 2007) shows the DES technique in action through the participation of a subject called “Melanie,” interleaved with a dialogue between “proponent” and “skeptic.”

Perhaps a reason underlying their dispute came out in this comment by Eric, late in the book (p. 296):

Russ and I [Eric] hope for different things from these interviews, not equally easy to achieve. Russ wants a mostly accurate view of central features of Melanie’s experience, and he thinks we’ve attained that. I want insight into some of the big structural and theoretical questions about consciousness, and I’m not sure we’ve attained that.

The questions Schwitzgebel was interested in included “whether Melanie’s experience is rich or thin, whether her emotional experience is exhausted by bodily sensations, how broad the range of clarity is in her visual experience.”

This difference could explain, for example, why Hurlburt was less worried about possible confabulation than Schwitzgebel.

‘Bracketing of presuppositions’ is key to the method and requires some training for both interviewer and subject. The issue of observer effects and interviewer effects wasn’t raised, though it seems like that could also be a concern.

Inner experience is the medium we’re constantly immersed in, but it’s surprisingly elusive when one tries to stop it “mid-stream” to take a sample.

Theory aside, I thought the samples and descriptions of inner experience were fascinating in themselves, such as the discussion of different ways of reading (p. 101 – images, inner speech or just reading), or the description of “Fran” (section 2.3.2.1) who had no figure-ground differentiation and whose “inner experience was frequently populated by multiple (as many as five or ten) visual images, all occurring simultaneously and in the same ‘visual space,’” some lasting for “hours or days, nonstop, uninterrupted.” It would be interesting and valuable to get some idea of the range of inner experience, as Hurlburt recommends psychological science should “develop a taste for specific moments.” (p. 260)

Metapsychology Online Reviews also recently posted a review of this book.

MIT Press’s Companion site for the book has transcripts and audio files of the interviews with “Melanie” plus some full text from the book.

For more on Descriptive Experience Sampling – Exploring Inner Experience by Russell T. Hurlburt and Christopher L. Heavey can be viewed online at publisher John Benjamins (after installation of free ebrary reader).

At Metapsychology Online Reviews, in a new review today of Susan Blackmore’s ‘Conversations on Consciousness,’ reviewer Gert-Jan C. Lokhorst suggests that consciousness has some features of a “wicked problem” – a concept from the planning literature. There is no definitive formulation of the problem, no stopping rule, and no idea of what would constitute a satisfactory solution to the problem.

Courtesy of philipkdickfans.com: